O happy days … Of course I forgot to mention in those seminars that Indonesia then was a secular country where Islamic law only extend to family matters and is only appied to those who take their religion seriously.
So what happened? Did i fall off a bus, did a durian fall of a tree and hit me on my head? Was it braindamage? A sad childhood? Or was it the trauma of having been dumped by a Muslim boyfriend? Or all of the above that made me dislike Islam, or Islamic law specifcally?
That’s the magazine with me in it!
Here is the page featuring me sitting next to the wife of the ambassador to Palestine and again, me holding the mike. Cute, huh? I was SIZE 8 then!! And pls dont laugh!!!! I know it is not exactly Tatller, but hey, I made it into a magazine. The magazine is so old now, that the colours have faded.
OK. Here’s the story. It was not until I was asked by a lawyerfriend of mine to study the sharia. Being a laywer by education and profession myself, I happily agreed. There is a demand of sharia lawyers in London and I have a huge mortgage. So, sounds like a good opportunity.
In my brief brush with sharia law in university I have always known that the sharia was discriminatory. Non-muslims are barred from becoming leaders, barred from inheriting from muslims. But all that,must be just misinterpretation. So I thought, until I picked up those two books.
My copy of my Qur’an. The yellow post-its indicate the verses with not so pleasant messages about non-Muslims, Jews especially.
The Reliance of the Traveller. Yes, ‘Traveller’ with 2 Ls. It compiles Islamic law as applied for the past 1400 years and sadly, is the basis of sharia for the next 1400 years (IF Islam survives that long).
So, there you have it. I have read and studied the sharia. And I dont like what I saw. 20% of sharia law is about religious matters but the rest is law: the law about how to treat Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Muslims do not apply it 100%, except in Saudi, Afghanistan and Iran. The rest, like ‘moderate’ Egypt, Pakistan, Malaysia, the Maldives etc etc don’t do stoning, but they quite happily apply their discriminatory sharia regulations towards non-Muslims; non-Muslims cannot become leaders, cannot inherit from Muslims, are restricted in worship etc etc .. we all know this. But some of us rather call it ‘misinterpretation’ because we are too afraid to offend Muslims.
I am not afraid to offend anybody or suffer the consequences, if my accusations are based on real and hard facts. And dont forget that the sharia is being applied worldwide at an alarming rate, in Indonesia and the UK as well. And those who do not want to suffer discrimination and humiliation should either do their own research or speak up now.
http://www.demotiximages.com/news/362395/whitehall-erupts-over-sharia-law
Just read the books above for yourselves and you will be shocked. Not many Muslims know about the content of the sharia. Most of them think that it is only about religious matters. If only that were true. When I see Muslims freely spreading their religion in the UK, I often think, do they even care that non-Muslims are forbidden from spreading their religion in Muslim countries? DO they care how I would be treated in a Muslim country? Do they even give a toss that the sharia demand that Muslims be punished/killed for changing their religion? Of course they dont. SO, why should I care about how they feel if I criticize their less than generous attitude?
We all want to go to heaven. But why through applying discrimination and pain towards those who choose a different path? Why does Islam made only some of us suffer under the same sun?
So, there you have it. I am speaking up for a reason. If you dont like that reason, then dont blame me. Blame your own laziness to read these two most important books that will affect your lives sooner or later. You cannot expect people to give up their rights and speech easily.
So to you muslims who ‘proudly’ wear your Islamic attributes, I say SHAME ON YOU! You pose as victims, whilst in fact due to your sharia, YOU are the perpetrators of 1400 years of suffering. YOU brought this suffering upon yourselves and others and I will not hesitate in pointing this to you again and again and again and again … You no like? No problemo.
BECAUSE … for the love of the sharia who is capable of crimes like these? Only YOU are !!
http://koptisch.wordpress.com/2011/01/08/menetekel-fur-europa/#more-13398
http://mychristianblood.blogspirit.com/archive/2006/11/09/beheaded-girls-were-ramadan-trophies.html
superhalaman 
Anonim said:
Excellent but it needs translation itno bahasa. Love the pictures!
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
So, you’ve seen the light. Good for you, lady. Biasanya wanita, apalagi wanita muslim, lebih susah disadarkan. For a lot of women, their feelings are their only truth. Perasaan kasihan akan ‘penderitaan’ rakyat Palestina bisa membutakan mata seseorang sehingga ada seorang wanita non islam Rachel Corrie yg konon kabarnya memilih martir ditabrak tank Israel demi ‘membela’ ‘rakyat’ Palestina. Andai saja Rachel Corrie tidak tenggelam dalam emosi belas kasihan yg membutakan matanya terhadap pengaruh buruk kepercayaan Islam terhadap sekelompok manusia yg disebut rakyat Palestina. Wanita sering demikian, dibutakan oleh emosi, entah itu belas kasihan yg cupet, ataupun cinta yg buta. Setelah anda pelajari hukum Sharia secara netral tanpa dipengaruhi emosi buta, baru sadar bagaimana Islam radikal bisa begitu saja menyiksa bunuh wanita koptik dan memenggal kepala anak sekolah non muslim dengan begitu kejamnya. Sebagai catatan samping, saya melihat ada gejala narsis pada diri anda. Wajah anda (kalau benar itu wajah anda) yg terperangah setelah mempelajari hukum Sharia Islam, apakah itu perlu sebagai bukti you’ve got problem with Islam? A grown up like Ali Sina gak perlu menampilkan wajahnya, tulisannya sudah mewakili pemikiran yg keluar dari kalbunya. So, I’d like to say to you, grow up. Walaupun anda wanita yg tak takut mati, I don’t think it’s wise to show your face. You’ll be much more useful if you’re alive. Think about it and wisen up.
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
U’r right ! Thanx. Who is ALi Sina?
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
Islam radikal yang membunuh wanita-wanita dalam kasus diatas, tapi Islam moderat yang merupakan nafas Islam radikal. Semakin kurangnya Islam moderat, semakin kurang pula Islam radikal.
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
sesuai permintaan, foto pribadi penulis telah dicabut dari tulisannya
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
Dalam Islam, sangat dibuka lebar-lebar interpretasi pribadi, dan itu adalah tanggung jawab pribadi. Berbeda dengan inkuisisi, yang merupakan keputusan resmi dari lembaga agama resmi. Setiap manusia mempunyai latar belakang yang sangat kompleks, bisa bercampur aduk, sehingga dapat menimbulkan tindakan extreem.
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
In Islam, there is a big room for self interpretation. It does not mean inquisition from a legal authority. Every body should be only responsible to Allah.
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
Ali Sina is a pen name of an Iranian ex-Muslim who’s the main driving force of faithfreedom dot org website which blatantly exposes the true face of Islam. Well, there come Islam defender. Instead of admitting how despicable those radical Muslim can be, this one resorted to the typical blame game of “you did that too with inquisition”. That past inquisition of course is totally wrong but this brainwashed Islamic robot can’t even understand their radical brothers are the ones doing the present day inquisition. Cognitive dissonance, where facts opposed their blind beliefs, inevitably produced selective justification, self-deceptive blame game.
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
No authority body in Islam. Every body should be responsible for them self. This is the biggest misunderstanding of Islam.
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
Kalau anda sudah membaca Quran dan manual syariah yang lengkap dan utuh, anda akan melihat bahwa dalam islam, TIDAK diijinkan interpretasi macam2. Bagi Islam (Sunni) hanya ada satu Islam. Interpretasi macam2 hanya akan menimbulkan sekte2 yang justru akan menimbulkan perpecahan dlm islam. Hanya orang bodoh dan malas akan megnatakan bahwa Islam manusiawi, tergantung dari penafsirannya. Kalau gitu, Nazisme, fasisme, komunisme juga bisa dikatakan manusiawi, tergantung dari penafsirannya. Tapi Islam mau ditafsir jungkir balik gimanapun, Islam tetap biadab dan diskriminatif. Bagi mereka yang menolak mempelajari islam dgn netral, nama anda sudah tercatat sbg pemilik sebuah kapling di neraka. Inquisition Christian terjadi karena Muslim menginvasi dan mencaplok tanah2 Kristen. Islam memang agama maling dan pemerkosa!
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
Fakta sejarah tidak bisa dihapus begitu saja. Kalau anda memakai kata-kata kasar, itu adalah kepribadian anda sendiri.
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
Mas, mas baca dulu buku sejarahnya baru ngomong. Yang satu ngomongin Perang Salib yang lain ngomongin Inkuisisi dan dikira kedua-duanya sama, kacau lah diskusi. Perang Salib I (1096-1099) sampai yang ke VIII (1270) itu bertujuan merebut Yerusalem dari tangan penguasa Muslim. Kalau Inkuisisi itu lain dari Perang Salib. Inkuisisi Episcopal (1184) di Prancis itu untuk membasmi kaum Cathar yang dianggap aliran sesat. Inkuisisi Spanyol mulai 1478 itu untuk memerangi kaum yang tidak percaya pada ajaran Gereja Katholik, dipimpin oleh biarawan Dominican. Inkuisisi Roma mulai tahun 1588, diperintahkan oleh Paus Sixtus ke V. Tujuannya sama untuk mengganyang kaum yang tidak percaya ajaran agama Katholik. John Calvin yang Protestan juga melakukan inkuisisi terhadap orang Protestan yang beda pemahaman dengan Calvin. Sekarang kaum Muslim garis keras melakukan inkuisisi terhadap Ahmadiyah, Kristen, Katholik, pokoknya semua yang dianggapnya kafir. Suatu kemunduran cara berpikir! Sudah di abad 21 kok pikirannya masih seperti orang abad ke 12.
SukaSuka
Anonim said:
Kayaknya artikel ini tidak menyebut tentang Islam garis keras, lembek atau setengah matang. Syariah adalah Islam sesungguhnya, Islam unadulterated, tanpa ditambahi embel-embel ‘abangan.’ Syariah menampilkan wajah Islam sesungguhnya, yang tidka banyak diketahui Muslim. Muslim sangkanyo Islam hanyo nyangkut solat-solat sajo. Ternyato lain puak, nyo! Islam adalah sebuah aliran politik yang tiranis. Buka matomu indoensia !!
SukaSuka